This is no question when the health is over 90%, maybe required to consider replacement on 25% or lower only. The health change is not evil, it is a good thing - as by checking such values, we can check the usage level of the device and plan for replacement when it's required. The SSD is working correctly, without problems. This does not cause troubles in the operation of the SSD or does not mean that Hard Disk Sentinel shows an incorrect value. These are identified and displayed by the software. Sorry, but this is not a "problem" and generally there is no "false data reported" of course.Īs discussed, most SSDs provide attribute(s) to check the actual health level of the memory cells, which slowly but surely change with usage (writes: program/erase cycles). As far as I know these new 3D chips have nothing to do with the reporting itself, in fact they should be better in terms of reliability as the data is being stored in a more "spacier" way. It is a bit worrisome I would say - during the past 10 years I always used HDS and never had false data reported. The health is determined by SSD specific S.M.A.R.T. Problematic or weak sectors were not found. The status of the solid state disk is PERFECT. Hard Disk Sentinel for LINUX console 0.17圆4.8556 (c) 2017 Device 4: /dev/sde I've purchased a Toshiba TR200 SSD 21 days ago and the health steadily keeps decreasing from 100% - now is at 92%. Warranty replacement may be possible only when the device reports that the error-level threshold exceeded (when 0 % health displayed, as displayed for hard disks on but generally the warranty situation is similar with SSDs) or maybe if it produces other errors or do not work at all. The health decrease can be generally annoying, but as long as the health is high, we can be sure that the device is perfectly working - and may help to plan replacement only when it drops. Generally as the SSD is working correctly, there are no problems / issues with it, they can't offer replacement, can't provide different device instead of this one. To be honest, I'd not really prefer to ask the shop as they may not really able to do anything. Would be ideal to have an official explanation from the manufacturer, just not sure if we can get some official information. I'll verify the behaviour of this particular model and examine what can be in the background and check if it would be required to interpret the counters differently somehow. Yes, I can completely understand your thoughts, personally I also feel it is so interesting to see such relatively fast change in the reported overall health. The best would be if you can send developer report now (for reference) and maybe later upon any possible change, degradation, as this always helps in investigating a particular model, its reported health. I'd suggest to please use Report -> Send test report to developer option, then I can check the complete status. This is normal - and you do not need to worry about it now, as only 1% of the total lifetime used. This is completely independent from software, OS, restarts and so: as the amount of written data increases, the health slowly but surely decreases. If you want, you may check how that attribute changes with time on the S.M.A.R.T. This is what you can see in the text description area: there are no problems found, but the 173 Erase Count attribute determines the overall health of the device. If there are no further problems found, Hard Disk Sentinel reads these attributes which determine the complete health of the solid state device. The "wear-leveling" feature of the SSD tries to hide/minimise this effect but generally the SSD device reports the overall health of the memory cells by various attributes. Yes, the health is not 100%, "only" 99% - but it is still "EXCELLENT" see next to the health % bar.Īs you may know, the memory cells in solid state devices experience wear during each write operations and each cells tolerate only a limited number of overwrite passes. No, I can confirm that you do not need to worry.Īs the software displays the status is PERFECT, there are no problems with the SSD. (see the bottom of the page about SSD health) Not sure why you did not find the answer, as it is already discussed on the forum: I can confirm that it is completely normal and expected, nothing "can be done about this" (and nothing needs to be done). Thanks for the information and sorry for the confusion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |